OB Hemorrhage - Embolization Resources

REVIEW ARTICLE: Post-partum hemorrhage is an obstetrical emergency. Pelvic artery embolisation offers an alternative to surgical intervention and increases the rate of conservative treatment. The objective of this review was to study the scientific literature on obstetrical outcomes following uterine-sparing arterial embolisation performed for post-partum hemorrhage in a prior pregnancy. A Medline and Sciencedirect search were performed in order to review all the French and English reports about pregnancy following pelvic arteries embolisation for post-partum hemorrhage. Nineteen articles were identified and 13 were selected for inclusion. We have included the fertility follow-up of a total of 168 women who underwent pelvic arteries embolisation for post-partum hemorrhage. We highlight the clinical success of embolisation in 154 of the 168 patients (92%). Following the embolisation procedures, 7 hysterectomies were required and 4 patients died. Two of the 4 deaths occurred in women who were transferred from an outlying institution to a tertiary referral center. In this population, 45 pregnancies were described. Among these pregnancies, 32 resulted in live births (71%), 8 were miscarriages (18%) and 5 patients carried out voluntary termination of pregnancy (11%). The cesarean section rate was 62%. Post-partum hemorrhage occurred in 6 cases leading to 2 hysterectomies. In conclusion, pelvic arterial embolisation offers a safe and conservative alternative to surgical interventions for post-partum hemorrhage in well-selected patients desiring to preserve future fertility.

We performed a systematic review to identify all studies evaluating the success rates of treatment of major postpartum hemorrhage by uterine balloon tamponade, uterine compression sutures, pelvic devascularization, and arterial embolization. We included studies reporting on at least 5 cases. All searches were performed independently by 2 researchers and updated in June 2006. Failure of management was defined as the need to proceed to subsequent or repeat surgical or radiological therapy or hysterectomy, or death. As the search identified no randomized controlled trials, we proceeded to search for observational studies. This identified 396 publications, and after exclusions, 46 studies were included in the systematic review. The cumulative outcomes showed success rates of 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.7%-94.0%) for arterial embolization, 84.0% (95% CI, 77.5%-88.8%) for balloon tamponade, 91.7% (95% CI, 84.9%-95.5%) for uterine compression sutures, and 84.6% (81.2%-87.5%) for iliac artery ligation or uterine devascularization (P = 0.06). At present there is no evidence to suggest that any one method is better for the management of severe postpartum hemorrhage. Randomized controlled trials of the various treatment options may be difficult to perform in practice. As balloon tamponade is the least invasive and most rapid approach, it would be logical to use this as the first step in the management

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric hemorrhage is a significant cause of maternal morbidity and death. Postpartum hemorrhage that cannot be controlled by local measures has traditionally been managed by bilateral uterine artery or hypogastric artery ligation. These techniques have a high failure rate, often resulting in hysterectomy. In contrast, endovascular embolization techniques have a success rate of >90%. An additional benefit of the latter procedure is that fertility is maintained. We report our experience at Stanford University Medical Center in which this technique was used in 6 cases within the past 5 years.
STUDY DESIGN: Six women between the ages of 18 and 41 years underwent placement of arterial catheters for emergency (n = 3) or prophylactic (n = 3) control of postpartum bleeding. Specific diagnoses included cervical pregnancy (n = 1), uterine atony (n = 3), and placenta previa and accreta (n = 2).
RESULTS: Control of severe or anticipated postpartum hemorrhage was obtained with transcatheter embolization in 4 patients. A fifth patient had balloon occlusion of the uterine artery performed prophylactically, but embolization was not necessary. In a sixth case, bleeding could not be controlled in time, and hysterectomy was performed. The only complication observed with this technique was postpartum fever in 1 patient, which was treated with antibiotics and resolved within 7 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Uterine artery embolization is a superior first-line alternative to surgery for control of obstetric hemorrhage. Use of transcatheter occlusion balloons before embolization allows timely control of bleeding and permits complete embolization of the uterine arteries and hemostasis. Given the improved ultrasonography techniques, diagnosis of some potential high-risk conditions for postpartum hemorrhage, such as placenta previa or accreta, can be made prenatally. The patient can then be prepared with prophylactic placement of arterial catheters, and rapid occlusion of these vessels can be achieved if necessary.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of arterial embolization (AE) for treatment of primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and the factors associated with clinical success.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing AE for primary PPH at three institutions (N = 43) from 1996 through 2007 was conducted. Patients with an antepartum diagnosis of invasive placenta were excluded from the study. Mean patient age was 31 years +/- 5 (range, 21-40 y). Eighteen women (42%) were primiparous. Delivery details, transfusion requirements, hematology and coagulation results, embolization details, and clinical outcomes were collected. Clinical success was defined as cessation of bleeding without the need for repeat embolization, laparotomy, or hysterectomy after embolization; or death. The Fisher exact test was used to analyze nonparametric data.
RESULTS: The clinical success rate was 79% (n = 34). Four patients underwent successful repeat embolization. Two of 35 patients who had not undergone hysterectomy before embolization underwent hysterectomy for continued bleeding (without repeat embolization). One underwent hysterectomy 2 weeks after AE for uterine necrosis. One of eight patients who had undergone hysterectomy before AE required a laparotomy for a large retroperitoneal hematoma, and one patient died from cerebral anoxia secondary to hypotension despite repeat embolization. Clinical success was not related to mode of delivery, cause of PPH, transfusion requirements, time from delivery to embolization, or hysterectomy before AE (P > .05). Patients with active extravasation visualized angiographically were more likely to require repeat embolization (five of 13 [38%] vs 0 of 30 without extravasation; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: AE for primary PPH is safe and effective. Repeat embolization may be necessary in patients with active extravasation on angiography.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term sequelae of pelvic embolization for postpartum hemorrhage and to study the effect on fertility and menses.
METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients who underwent pelvic embolization for postpartum hemorrhage between the years 1977 and 2002 were included in the study. Chart review and telephone interviews were conducted to gather data regarding the type of delivery, causative factors of the bleeding, preembolization treatments, total blood loss, length of time between delivery and embolization, complications, long-term side effects, and subsequent pregnancies.
RESULTS: The average (+/- standard deviation) time to follow-up was 11.7 +/- 6.9 years. The most common causes of hemorrhage were vaginal/cervical laceration, placenta accreta, and placenta previa. In only one case was the embolization unsuccessful, during which there was an accidental perforation of an internal iliac artery resulting in a retroperitoneal hematoma and subsequent total abdominal hysterectomy. All of the interviewed patients that desired to get pregnant after embolization were able to do so. Six patients reported a total of six uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries in the years after their embolization. Of the remaining patients interviewed, none made subsequent attempts to get pregnant. The most commonly reported long-term side effects were transient buttock numbness (n = 2) and urinary frequency (n = 2). In no patients were the side effects severe enough to seek further medical attention.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic arterial embolization is a safe and effective procedure and offers patients a fertility-preserving alternative to hysterectomy for treatment of intractable postpartum hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate what factors are associated with a failed pelvic arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage and to attempt to estimate efficacy of pelvic arterial embolization in rare conditions.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive women who underwent pelvic arterial embolization trial for postpartum hemorrhage between 1994 and 2007 at a tertiary care center. Pelvic arterial embolization failure was defined as the requirement for subsequent surgical procedure to control postpartum hemorrhage.
RESULTS: Pelvic arterial embolization was attempted in 0.3% of deliveries by the same radiologist in 87% of cases. Failures occurred in 11 of 100 cases (11%) and in 4 of 17 cases (24%) of placenta accreta or percreta. The major complication rate after pelvic arterial embolization was low (3%). Fifty patients (50%) were transferred from nine other institutions. Pelvic arterial embolization was performed in 11 cases (11%) after a failed conservative surgical procedure and in eight cases (8%) for secondary postpartum hemorrhage, with success rates of 91% and 88%, respectively. Pelvic arterial embolization demonstrated a patency throughout one ligated pedicle in 9 of the 11 cases of failed conservative surgical procedure (82%). Twin pregnancy, chorioamnionitis, operative vaginal delivery, hospital-to-hospital transfer, nature of embolizing agent and arteries embolized, failed surgical procedure, secondary postpartum hemorrhage, cause of postpartum hemorrhage, and more than one pelvic arterial embolization were not found to be significantly associated with failed pelvic arterial embolization.
CONCLUSION: The only factors significantly associated with failed pelvic arterial embolization were a higher rate of estimated blood loss (more than 1,500 mL) and more than 5 transfused red blood cell units. Attempted pelvic arterial embolization after a failed vessel ligation procedure and for a secondary postpartum hemorrhage is a good option with high success rates.